Search for: "Benson v. Benson" Results 301 - 320 of 646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
The policy objection to the Benson reasoning is that the scope of the reward should be commensurate with the scope of the contribution. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm by J
I thought the landlord would lose Daejan v Benson, and, as you all know, the landlord won (see our note here). [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm by J
I thought the landlord would lose Daejan v Benson, and, as you all know, the landlord won (see our note here). [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 8:37 am by J
For the last year or so, I have been confidently predicting (often vocally and to unsuspecting passers-by) that the landlord would lose its appeal in Daejan Properties Ltd v Benson [2013] UKSC 14. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 8:37 am by J
For the last year or so, I have been confidently predicting (often vocally and to unsuspecting passers-by) that the landlord would lose its appeal in Daejan Properties Ltd v Benson [2013] UKSC 14. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:30 am by Dan Ernst
  It is Megan Benson, Railroads, Water Rights and the Long Reach of Houston and Texas Central Railroad Company v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm by Ritika Singh
” As Wells posted earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Clapper v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 2:14 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch One issue put before the en banc Federal Circuit in CLS Bank v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:35 am by Rob Merges
The early software cases, such as Gottschalk v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:44 am by John Diekman
Practice point: An exchange of e-mails may constitute an enforceable agreement if the writings include all of the agreement's essential terms, including the fee, or other cost, involved.Student note: The existence of the valid and enforceable fee agreement precludes the causes of action sounding in quasi contract.Case: Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:15 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP. v Duane Reade (2012 NY Slip Op 05889): The New York Appellate Division has held that 3 emails between a lawyer and a corporate client set forth a fee agreement between the two parties. [read post]