Search for: "Blake v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 465
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
It is unsurprising, therefore, that more questions are being asked as to whether our judges are properly qualified to understand and rule on such controversial areas, even to the extent of looking more closely at their religious beliefs; something which is common in relation to the United States Supreme Court but until now has been unusual in the UK. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
As Judge Campbell noted in Blake v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Further, contrary to the petitioners' contention, the law does not limit the application of a lack of marketability discount to the goodwill of a corporation in all instances (see Matter of Brooklyn Home Dialysis Training Ctr., 293 AD2d 747; Hall v King, 265 AD2d 244, 245; Lehman v Piontkowski, 203 AD2d 257, 259; Matter of Raskin v Walter Karl, Inc., 129 AD2d 642, 644; Matter of Joy Wholesale Sundries, 125 AD2d 310; Matter of Fleischer, 107 AD2d 97; Matter of… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:23 am
United States Plywood Corp., 318 F. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:02 pm
. ''Casey'' Ebsary has just obtained an Internal Policy Memorandum on Charging and Sentencing that was just circulated to Assistant United States Attorneys. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am
Concurring Opinions addresses Kagan’s scholarly record as well, arguing that, although it may be “modest,” it is “simply irrelevant to the question of her qualifications to serve as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 10:21 am
Washington and United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
United States, 893 P.2d 345 (Nev. 1995); Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:12 pm
Blakely v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
The Fort Worth Division of the United States District Court, Northern Division, recently handed down a decision that would at the least be interesting to home builders. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
, 514 U.S. 695 (1995), that a federal court is not a department or agency of the United States for the purposes of making false statements in a matter within the jurisdiction of the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:49 am
He was one of the winning attorneys in the consolidated decisions in Besser v Walsh, _F3d_ [2d Cir 3/31/10]) in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit struck down New York's persistent felony offender law as unconstitutional, holding that “the New York courts’ upholding of the constitutionality of the New York state persistent felony offender statute after the United States Supreme Court’s decision… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:52 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
United States). [read post]
