Search for: "Board of Trade v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 2,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas stated that DHS’s actions illustrate its “ongoing commitment to Afghan nationals who provided valuable assistance to the United States over the past two decades. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
The European Data Protection Board (“EDPB”) adopted Guidelines 10/2020 on restrictions under Article 23 of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) (the “Guidelines”) following public consultation. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:43 am by Andrew Hamm
These and other petitions of the week are below: United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:29 am by INFORRM
Breyer, Supreme Court of the United States ·      Honorable Justice D.Y. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
As to the fifth element, sometimes considered the most important, the Board pointed out that the United States has a "strong interest in ensuring parties in proceedings before the Board have access to the information they need to litigate their claims and for the Board to fully and fairly adjudicate them. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A&N Trading Co., No. 19-2951 (2d Cir. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]