Search for: "Boeing v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2021, 12:16 pm
Circuit’s holding in Penrod v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 12:37 pm
In Claisse v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:26 pm
Supreme Court in Egelhoff v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 2:43 pm
Supreme Court in Egelhoff v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am
Laster is quite correct when he quotes extensively from prior Delaware Supreme Court decisions stating that “the fiduciary duties of officers are the same as those of directors. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
In 2010, U.S. companies obtained 50.3% of granted patents, compared with 49% in 2009.High-tech patents also dominated areas with the heaviest new patenting activity:Multiplex Communications (US class 370) -- 3.3% of totalSolid-State Devices and Transistors (US class 257) -- 3.1%Semiconductors (US class 438) -- 2.7%Drug Compositions (US class 514) -- 2.1% Data Processing and File Management (US class 707) -- 2%Computers and Processing Systems (US class 709) -- 2%… [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:27 pm
You might want to read Egelhoff v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
The legal precedent Joanne Turner v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm
Based on the Supreme Court’s decision in New Process Steel v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Ezendam B.V. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Iowa was the only state with a lifetime ban on voting for people convicted of a felony. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:06 am
To be sure, in a series of cases staring with the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
The court stated that it did not need to decide whether liability existed under the prong 1 claim to dispose of the motion to dismiss, but noted that a report prepared by external counsel indicated that the company had a “woefully inadequate compliance system. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:30 pm
John Culberson said that both Sierra Nevada and Boeing are using the Atlas V, powered by a Russian-built RD-180 engine, Bolden responded, “I didn’t know that. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 11:17 am
. * Boes v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm
The program will also include a panel of IP experts such as Tara Rosnell and Christopher V. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
