Search for: "Brennan v. Brennan" Results 301 - 320 of 1,730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 2:47 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Carter-Ruck (A Firm) v Mireskandari [2011] EWHC 24 (QB) (21 January 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) 32Red Plc (A Gibraltar Company) v WHG (International) Ltd & Ors [2011] EWHC 62 (Ch) (21 January 2011) Howard v Howard-Lawson [2011] EWHC 63 (Ch) (21 January 2011) High Court (Family Division) CW v NT & Anor [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam) (21 January 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Hughes (Setting of Minimum… [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 3:27 pm
 However, Pennsylvania courts have in the past recognized an exception where an employee’s termination violates a “clear mandate of public policy,” but such situations have been limited to circumstances in which an employer: (1) requires an employee to commit a crime; (2) prevents an employee from complying with a statutorily imposed duty; or (3) discharges an employee when specifically prohibited from doing so by statute.In the recent case of Brennan… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 5:33 am
The Article next argues that such an approach may have clarified the treatment of social context in Moldea v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 5:30 am by Unknown
Jackson Women's Health Organization and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:32 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 114820 (WD PA, July 11, 2018), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that he missed a Jummah prayer service and the feast of Eid Al-Fitr.In Brennan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by SHG
It may end up that the right to an abortion is subject to restrictions rather than unfettered, but then Roe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:31 am by Stephen Bilkis
Despite widespread misconceptions, prisoners do have rights protected under the Constitution, particularly under the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:09 pm
That said, I do think there are reasons for senators to avoid specific questions about controversial cases, such as, especially, Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
If you're interested in reading all 39 amicus briefs and those of the parties, see this page on the Brennan Center site. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:38 pm by Julie Lam
Brennan, No. 142765, pending on appeal before the Court. [read post]