Search for: "CAMPBELL v. CAMPBELL" Results 301 - 320 of 3,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Privacy spotlighted This issue was not long untouched by the courts- in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EMLR 20 the judge Eady J. provided useful guidance to assist in the application of Campbell’s second limb. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 7:49 pm
From a comment sent to me via email: This is a PDF copy of the Order of Judge Tena Campbell concerning the "online identifiers" case in Utah against myself, John Doe. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm by admin
Campbell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in: Dale v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:43 pm
Westchester based Criminal Defense Law Firm, Tilem & Campbell, is following with great interest the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
Since Campbell there had been only a couple of outlier cases, one of those being Dukes v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:53 am by sally
Supreme Court F & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 (21 April 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lui v Chong [2010] EWCA Civ 398 (21 April 2010) Williams v Lishman, Sidwell, Campbell & Price Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 418 (21 April 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Phoenix Partners Group Llp v Asoyag [2010] EWHC 846 (QB) (21 April 2010) High Court (Administrative Court)… [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 12:39 am by Andrew Trask
It’s rapidly becoming conventional wisdom that Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:45 pm
Justice Streeter ends this opinion with a fairly lengthy footnote justifying his decision to publish this opinion. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 1:02 pm
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.Even if the parties may think (or may even say) they're not in a dating relationship, if that's what they're in fact in, the trial court may permissibly so find. [read post]