Search for: "COTTER "
Results 301 - 320
of 504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 9:50 am
But if the Federal Circuit feels that Google's (and Qualcomm's) warnings against a devaluation of FRAND-pledged SEPs can be outcome-determinative, then Apple is in for a really rough ride at the appellate hearing.It has been pointed out by others, of which I'd like to particularly mention Professor Thomas Cotter, that FRAND determinations factoring in the inevitable uncertainty surrounding the validity and essentiality of declared-essential patents could result in what I would describe as a… [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 5:47 pm
Holland Cotter explains how MoMA's new Sonnabend show is in part "a byproduct of legal hassles":"[Rauschenberg's] 'Canyon' plays a major role here. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
Well, former guest Kat Norman Siebrasse, together with University of Minnesota law professor Tom Cotter (left), are co-blogging a series of posts on Greg's article. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 11:16 am
Here it is: "If it proves that the worst seems about to happen, the art world should get itself out to Detroit en masse and put its communal spirit to good use: Form a human circle around the building and, in one voice, just say no." [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 7:17 am
In a review of a William Kentridge piece now up at the Met, Holland Cotter says:"The piece ... has recently been acquired jointly by the Metropolitan and the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. ... [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:21 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 69For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press SummaryFor a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Cotter v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2013] UKSC 69 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
Cotter, a professor specializing in intellectual property at the University of Minnesota Law school, noted that extending VARA protections to 5Pointz would seem to leave the Wolkoffs with no practical legal means of tearing down their own building, which “wouldn’t make a great deal of sense." [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:46 am
On Wednesday 6 November 2013 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs; and In the matter of “The Alexandros T” (Nos. 1, 2 and 3). [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 11:30 am
Cotter, University of Minnesota Law School has written on The Comparative Law and Economics of Standard-Essential Patents and FRAND Royalties. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am
Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 October 2013. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am
Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 October 2013. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 October 2013. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:05 am
Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 October 2013. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 2:16 am
Cotter v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs is the attraction. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:27 am
The Michaelmas term starts on Thursday 3 October 2013 with Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, to be heard by L Neuberger, L Sumption, L Reed, L Toulson, and L Hodge. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:31 am
The Michaelmas Term starts next Thursday (3 October 2013) with Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs in the Supreme Court, and Bethel & Ors v The Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Bahamas in the Privy Council. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
In the now-mandatory Professional Responsibility course, most law schools use the text Lawyers’ Ethics and Professional Regulation by Alice Woolley, Richard Devlin, Brent Cotter and John M. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:26 am
I’d try to work my really easy stuff so I could get my numbers up,” said Renee Cotter, a union steward for the Reno, Nev., local of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
Professor Thomas Cotter, who also feels misunderstood by Commissioner Wright, explains on his Comparative Patent Remedies blog that "the contract and patent remedies issues are distinct; in theory, a court could decide that there is no contractual obligation to forgo injunctive relief but still conclude that an injunction is not warranted as a matter of the law of patent remedies, because damages are an adequate remedy". [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Professor Cotter, in a case comment on this decision, highlighted a rational for considering non-infringing alternatives when calculating damages: If, but for the infringement, the defendant would have resorted to a non-infringing alternative that would have enabled it to make all the sales it made using an infringing product, the patentee quite literally has suffered no lost profit attributable to the infringement. [read post]
