Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 12:42 pm
The ABC test differs markedly from the approach previously used in California—an approach mirrored in the DOL opinion letter and used in a number of other states. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 6:38 am
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:00 am
For more information on the new CFRA regulations, see the April 13, 2015, issue of California Employment Law Letter. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 9:35 am
The DLSE opined that an employer could properly do this, without violating the salary basis test and without jeopardizing the exempt status of its employees under federal or California law. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:22 pm
These numbers do not include the many extortionate demand letters sent to businesses, nor does it include lawsuits filed in state courts. [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:55 am
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
This case has importance to labor law practitioners in California, specifically in PAGA cases with jurisdiction issues. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:20 am
” California law does not require employers to provide the candidate with their assessment. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Application to California Employers For California employers, the new DOL Opinion Letter clarifies employer responsibilities – especially after the Ninth Circuit case, Escriba v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:46 am
Patrick Taurel, an attorney with Clark Hill and a contributor to Nevada Employment Law Letter, also says that employers have to ensure their workforce is authorized and that the best way to do that is to institute proper I-9 processes. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:46 am
Patrick Taurel, an attorney with Clark Hill and a contributor to Nevada Employment Law Letter, also says that employers have to ensure their workforce is authorized and that the best way to do that is to institute proper I-9 processes. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:53 am
Additionally, debt collection agencies must seize sending letters or making calls to collect unpaid debts from consumers who have filed for bankruptcy protection in the state of California. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:30 pm
Seyfarth Synopsis: Pay equity and Ban The Box bills lead the list of bills approved to continue their quest (moving to the other house of the California Legislature) to become California law. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
We will cover this case in more detail in the next issue of California Employment Law Letter. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:06 pm
DHS will not use anemployer's receipt of a no-match letter as evidence to find that it violated the law by knowingly employing unauthorized workers as long as the employer follows the safe harbor rules. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:17 am
The post $58.25M Sexual Harassment and Battery Verdict Has Important Takeaways For Employers appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 am
The director of California's Department of Industrial Relations issued an opinion letter clarifying one of the provisions of California's baby WARN Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
The new law largely codifies the ABC test adopted in Dynamex, meaning the test would serve as the standard in California for determining employment status. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:12 pm
A litany of these cases are brought by Swigart Law Group, APC (“Swigart Law”), a law firm based out of California. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
Employer contestation of the claim. [read post]
