Search for: "California v. Camp" Results 301 - 320 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
We were too busy - and none of our clients would pay for it in any event - so we didn't attend yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in Riegel v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
Over time, competing camps began to coalesce around the first and third interpretations. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Woody (California violated the religious liberty of members of the Native American Church who used peyote). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:36 pm by Amy Howe
ShareOn Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Biden v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:30 am by EEM
Morales-Santana," Southern California Law Review, vol. 90, no. 1 (Nov. 2016)"Stranglehold Refoulement: Fear of Constructively Forced Returns of Burmese Refugees as Consequence of Thailand’s Combined Human Rights Violations," Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 40, no. 2 (2017)Related post:- Open Access Round-up: 15 March 2017Tagged Publications. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> CTS Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 11:51 am by Vanessa Sauter
” A training exercise in Camp Pendleton, California turned dangerous on Wednesday when an amphibious assault vehicle with 15 Marines inside burst into flames, according to Business Insider. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Underscoring the importance of the issue, 24 briefs have been filed by an array of amici, from law enforcementofficials to California Governor Gavin Newsom to the homeless advocates the LA Alliance for Human Rights. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:23 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Rules in this “mandatory camp” are not subject to the equitable approach the 9th Circuit applied. [read post]