Search for: "Chamberlain v. Chamberlain" Results 301 - 320 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 21 March 2024, Chamberlain J handed down judgement in the case of Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited [2024] EWHC 647 (KB). [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
On 7-8 March 2024, there was a hearing in the data protection case of Lynch v Serious Fraud Office KB-2024-000237. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
This newest update includes leading cases ranging from the classic 1970s landmark judgment in Klass and others v Germany to the Haščák v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
There was also a hearing in the case of LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 24 March 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Hayden v Family Education Trust. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
The Evan Law blog has a summary of the recent decision Allen v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 10:15 am by Eric Goldman
Lura Chamberlain, FOSTA: A Hostile Law with a Human Cost, 87 Fordham L. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
[Online] Available at: http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Guidance_for_exporters_issue_1_2016.pdf (accessed 27 September 2017). [7] Op. cit. [8] The Waverley Criteria were adopted in the United Kingdom in 1952, and were based on recommendations in a report chaired by John Anderson, first Viscount Waverley: Chamberlain, K. and Hausler, K. (2015) United Kingdom. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:50 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Having financed the rise of Maximilian I, Jakob Fugger made considerable contributions to secure the election of the Spanish king Charles I to become Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. [read post]
[Online] Available at: http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Guidance_for_exporters_issue_1_2016.pdf (accessed 27 September 2017). [7] Op. cit. [8] The Waverley Criteria were adopted in the United Kingdom in 1952, and were based on recommendations in a report chaired by John Anderson, first Viscount Waverley: Chamberlain, K. and Hausler, K. (2015) United Kingdom. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm by Schachtman
Fisher noted that Lanier had been branded as deceptive by the second highest court in the United States, the United States Court of Appeals, in Christopher v. [read post]
[Online] Available at: http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Guidance_for_exporters_issue_1_2016.pdf (accessed 27 September 2017). [7] Op. cit. [8] The Waverley Criteria were adopted in the United Kingdom in 1952, and were based on recommendations in a report chaired by John Anderson, first Viscount Waverley: Chamberlain, K. and Hausler, K. (2015) United Kingdom. [read post]
[Online] Available at: http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Guidance_for_exporters_issue_1_2016.pdf (accessed 27 September 2017). [7] Op. cit. [8] The Waverley Criteria were adopted in the United Kingdom in 1952, and were based on recommendations in a report chaired by John Anderson, first Viscount Waverley: Chamberlain, K. and Hausler, K. (2015) United Kingdom. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 26 January 2022 there was a directions hearing in the case of HM Attorney-General v BBC before Chamberlain J. [read post]