Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court"
Results 301 - 320
of 367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
These plans required no zoning variances and did not affect the City of Los Angeles’s (“L.A. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
City of Los Angeles, 47 Cal.4th 970 (2010), which held that a trial court has discretion in a FEHA case to deny a successful plaintiff his attorneys' fees when the plaintiff chooses to proceed in an unlimited civil jurisdiction, but recovers less than the jurisdictional minimum. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
Over half an hour after the execution began, a doctor wearing a blue hood to cover his face entered the execution chamber to check Angel Diaz's vital signs. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 10:09 am
As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
As for me and my firm, I have been practicing law in Los Angeles for 35 years. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Box 1325 Simi Valley, CA 93065 Phone: (805) 582-1881 E-mail: dssaccca@aol.com Sacramento Center for Assistive Technology 701 Howe Avenue, Suite E-5 Sacramento, CA 95825 Phone: (916) 927-7228 E-mail: scat@quiknet.com Web: http://www.quiknet.com/~scat San Diego Assistive Technology Center UCP of San Diego County 3821 Calle Fortunada, Suite C San Diego, CA 92123 Phone: (858) 571-7803 E-mail: ucpsdatc@pacbell.net Team of Advocates for Special Kids 100 West Cerritos Avenue Anaheim, CA 92805 Phone:… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
This so-called "Glomar response" is derived from a Cold War-era case, when the CIA refused to confirm or deny to the Los Angeles Times whether it had information about the USNS Hughes Glomar Explorer, a CIA ship that was used to try to salvage a sunken Soviet spy sub. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:42 am
” City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
City of Los Angeles, 155 Cal. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
The Court of Appeal will have original jurisdiction over these claims. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
These cases are filed with the court and are all public record. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
