Search for: "Clinton v. Clinton" Results 301 - 320 of 2,723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2008, 4:52 am
Clinton Puts Stretchmarks on Sisterhood. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:16 am by Ted Frank
The deciding vote was Clinton appointee Frank Hull. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:04 pm
State Department’s mandatory retirement at age 65 of certain employees policy violates Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)  Miller v Clinton, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #10-5405 The United States Department of State terminated the employment of John R. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm by Sandy Levinson
 With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:32 pm
Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have responded to today's Supreme Court ruling in Crawford v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 2:52 pm
  Candidate Bill Clinton's speech at the 1992 Democratic convention was titled "A Place Called Hope," and I could not resist riffing off that title for this post about US v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
In Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurance Bureau [2010] EWCA Civ 1208, the Court of Appeal held that where a person is injured by an uninsured driver and is entitled to recover from the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB), that person is entitled to recover damages assessed according to English law, rather than the law where the accident occurred.The appellant, Mr Jacobs (a resident of the UK) was seriously injured when struck by a car while holidaying in Spain. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
In light of the Supreme Court decision this week in Kimbrough v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:55 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Junto con ellos, sobre 10 mil estudiantes de las Islas Vírgenes de los Estados Unidos, y más de 6 millones de estudiantes de todos los Estados Unidos, culminaran el proceso cívico educativo más grande para esta elección general. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 1:35 pm
  The Clinton and Obama appointees go one way and the Bush and Trump appointees go the other.It's a 16-13 split in favor of the Democratic appointees right now amongst the active judges in the Ninth Circuit (with no vacancies), so it's more likely than not (around 55%) that a random draw of judges would result in an 11-person panel with a Democratic majority. [read post]