Search for: "Coca-Cola Company, The"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2018, 11:32 am
Grocery stores advertise special deals on Coca-Cola and we put “Windex” on our grocery lists. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
A trio of cases filed in late 2017 against three of the largest “diet” branded beverage companies — The Coca-Cola Co., Pepsi-Cola Co. and Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am
In the UK the company assigned their rights to the name Schweppes to Coca-Cola in 1999, but remained the owner of the rights in other EU jurisdictions, including Spain. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 12:11 pm
The Coca-Cola product placement elements were removed when the company ceased being the sole sponsor . . . [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
https://t.co/7xJBvlbs4s 2017-12-08 Use of trade mark on website outside EU can cause dilution in the EU rules CJEU in Coca-Cola case https://t.co/oZFjTpI3LW 2017-12-08 CJEU rules that luxury brand owner can prohibit distributor from selling goods on websites such as Amazon https://t.co/7jMltaOptg 2017-12-08 I was a Messenger spoof victim https://t.co/d8HG4nPe8C 2017-12-08 Website blocking proposal good policy https://t.co/itEuO1DFlo 2017-12-08 RT @neilturkewitz: @bsookman… [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:53 am
This year, Coca Cola was sued for knowingly misleading consumers by actively denying links between sugar consumption, obesity and heart disease. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:00 pm
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., 833 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 2016). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:00 pm
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., 833 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 2016). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:30 am
Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co.), which held that “Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:08 pm
Lawyers Charged With Assisting a Microcap Fraud SchemeThe SEC charged two lawyers it alleges helped facilitate a microcap fraud scheme involving undisclosed “blank check” companies secretly bound for reverse mergers.SEC Files Charges in Snack Company Investment ScamThree individuals defrauded investors in a company that falsely claimed to be developing a caffeinated chocolate snack and nearing an acquisition by Monster Energy or Coca-Cola Co. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
(Chinese speakers can find a good summary here.)Background and CommentaryWhile perhaps not particularly known among the average EU consumer, in China (including Hong Kong), where it is recognized primarily as a herbal tea brand sold in red cans, 王老吉 is as popular as Coca Cola (see the picture below).It is noted that the predecessor to the current GBP holding company had licensed the mark to Hong Kong Hong Dao Group (HKHD), authorising it to sell herbal… [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
Coca-Cola's "Share a Coke" campaign may serve as a useful framework to highlight this approach. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:09 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged three individuals who defrauded investors in a company that falsely claimed to be developing a caffeinated chocolate snack and nearing an acquisition by Monster Energy or Coca-Cola Co.The SEC’s complaint alleges that Lisa Bershan and her husband, Barry Schwartz, together with business associate Joel Margulies, falsely promised investors that after being acquired, Starship Snack Corp. investors would get a… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 10:00 pm
Classic examples of this are words like “Coca Cola” and “Pepsi. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:50 am
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, where a blind man from Louisiana claimed that Coca-Cola had violated his rights under the Americans With Disabilities Act by not providing accessible vending machines. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am
In 1999 Schweppes sold the rights to the name to the Coca-Cola Company in 13 EU Member States (including the UK), keeping their rights in 18 other countries in the EU, among which was Spain. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
And courts and the USPTO have occasionally applied public use doctrine to find that the widespread use of a mark by the public, like “Coke” for Coca-Cola, “Mac” for Macintosh computers, or “the Evil Empire” for the Yankees, can give rise to protectable trademark rights or at least provide adequate foundation to prevent a competitor from making use of a confusingly similar term. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 2:20 am
This means that across the EEA, some SCHWEPPES marks are owned by Schweppes International, some are owned by Coca Cola and invariably the marks are licensed either to different operating companies or in some cases to Coca Cola. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm
If The Coca-Cola Company has a Lockean property right in the positive associations consumers have with its business, what right does it have in its trademarks, such as Coke, Coca-Cola, and distinctive red-and-white packaging? [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:16 pm
Making sense of trade mark conflict in the EUTM system | The challenge of protecting a database without a sui generis right, this time from Singapore | France: costs of blocking injunctions to be borne by internet intermediaries | INTA Trademark Administrators and Practitioners Meeting--early bird registration ends August 4th | TILTing Perspectives 2017 (First Part: Online Enforcement and Black Box Tinkering) | France: 13 million in damages awarded for linking to downloadable copyright works… [read post]
