Search for: "Coke v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2010, 12:16 pm
CI says there's a shit ton of coke and heroin in this stash house. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
United States and Boumediene v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Chief Justice Hughes in the 1932 case Crowell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Hernández v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 6:46 pm
Coke. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:13 pm
Their coverage has a lot of overlap -- they both have state and federal cases, statutes, and regulations, they both have lots of law reviews, and so on. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:33 am
Notably, the proposed changes would overturn the United States Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:22 am
The case of Crown Coal & Coke Company v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
Even poorly educated consumers can distinguish Coke and Pepsi in the marketplace and will not be confused if a Pepsi ad appears in response to a keyword search for Coke. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 3:26 am
Coke, Battle of the Misleading Fruits. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:47 am
” In Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:43 pm
The Court thus remanded his case to the district court, where he would be allowed to prove the truth of his allegations at an evidentiary hearing.James Harold Griffith v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 5:08 am
For an example of the most important one, see Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:43 pm
The Court thus remanded his case to the district court, where he would be allowed to prove the truth of his allegations at an evidentiary hearing.James Harold Griffith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:18 am
Rees and Glossip v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 5:43 am
Moore v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:34 pm
Permitting agencies could also require existing sources of SO2 emissions to model their potential impact as part of any Title V modification or renewal application. [read post]
