Search for: "Coles v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2014, 5:45 pm
Although the precise start date remains the subject of litigation—see United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
The state claims that the Waller v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Moreover, in Weber v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am
Constitution’s Contract Clause (Welch v Brown, January 3, 2014, Cole, G). [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:56 am
Cole, which killed seventeen U.S. military personnel; and the 2002 bombing of the M/V Limburg, which killed one civilian. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Jane posted a summary of two United States Signals Intelligence Directives (USSID) continuing Lawfare’s coverage of the latest ODNI declassification trove. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:05 pm
United States, 132 S. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
As such, managers that rely on the CFTC’s Rule 4.13(a)(3) exemption from registration as a CPO, and managers that are registered CPOs operating under the CFTC Rule 4.7 exemption, remain prohibited from marketing to the public in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
Cole v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
By Kerr's reckoning, their arguments were "essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
United States, John posted the comments of Edwin Williamson, former Department of State Legal Adviser in the George H.W. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am
United States, which Matt Danzer summarizes here, offers more guidance on the First Amendment and terrorism than Ben and the always-thoughtful Marty Lederman have suggested. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:26 am
In the end, United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:40 pm
United States, 502 U.S. 46 (1991)], we need go no further. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
Next came the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, including the significant section 702, which enabled collection against foreigners reasonably believed to be outside the United States to proceed, not under probable cause requirements, but under a Director of National Intelligence and Attorney General approved certification, and under targeting and minimization procedures approved by the FISC. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 10:54 pm
If I’m right that this difference explains our disagreement, then we’re essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:57 am
As we begin a week of pre-trial sessions in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
United States Dep’t of Labor Bull. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
