Search for: "Com. v. Trial" Results 301 - 320 of 1,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Failure to refer to the indicative factors mentioned in Com (2009) 313 did not matter. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:43 am by Stephen Pitel
  There is considerable American law on this issue, including the much-discussed decision in Zippo Manufacturing v Zippo Dot Com Inc., 952 F Supp 119 (WD Pa 1997). [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:00 am by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
OT Fight, Queuing Up Damages Trial,” https://www.law360.com/articles/915697/(last accessed May 19, 2017). [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Eric Goldman
Recently, the FTC filed its “Complaint Counsel’s Corrected Pre-Trial Brief and Exhibits” in the Matter of 1-800 Contacts, Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
For an ongoing commercial com-pounding process, this approach cannot provide “reasonablecertainty” regarding the scope of the asserted claims.Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
    Accounts of profits: CRISTAL clear when the other side doesn’t show upChampagne Louis Roederer v J Garcia Carrion [2017] EWHC 289(February 2017)Benny tasting some champagneMost trade mark cases are heard by way of split trial. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Further, “CEQA forbids ‘piecemeal’ review of the significant environmental impacts of a project” (quoting Berkeley Keep Jets Over The Bay Com. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by Jon Katz
  – The meaning of a plea of no contest/nolo contendere is governed by Com. v. [read post]