Search for: "Cook v. Banks" Results 301 - 320 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2010, 8:47 am by JJS
  Indeed, as loan originations diminish, bank loan officers are reinventing themselves as workout specialists. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 3:01 am by charonqc
  I was greedy this morning and asked for  some beautifully cooked chips! [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:24 am by Dave
But the problem here was that, even if that were their intention, "It cannot be open to the parties to litigation to agree in advance with each other that they will procure an order from the court, but that the order will not in fact produce the legal effect it would ordinarily do" (at [34] - in passing, it would be interesting to know if Tinsley v Milligan was cited to HHJ Cooke but that is neither here nor there, I guess); they could always make an arrangement after the… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:24 am by Dave
But the problem here was that, even if that were their intention, "It cannot be open to the parties to litigation to agree in advance with each other that they will procure an order from the court, but that the order will not in fact produce the legal effect it would ordinarily do" (at [34] - in passing, it would be interesting to know if Tinsley v Milligan was cited to HHJ Cooke but that is neither here nor there, I guess); they could always make an arrangement after the… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:17 am by Hannah Buxbaum
  Instead, they are Central Bank of Denver, Dura, Tellabs, Stoneridge, and other cases cutting back the implied right of action. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Margaret Sachs
  Florida was the place where the subsidiary allegedly cooked its books and from which it then sent falsified figures to the bank’s headquarters in Australia. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:52 am by David Oscar Markus
What Rumpole doesn't tell you is that Scalia also dissented in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:42 pm by Paul Levy
  Happily, a recent case involving an investment bank that got a TRO against a message board host, in violation of section 230 immunity, has a happier ending, because the bank ended up before a federal judge who understood the technical details better than the bank’s own lawyers.Houlihan Smith Faces Online CriticismThis case involves Houlihan Smith & Co., a Chicago-based investment bank that apparently drums up new business by cold-calling companies… [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"Healing ourselves is the essence of democratic development. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:08 pm by Jim Hodgson
  Although the lower court judge recognized the merits of the Refco plaintiffs’ suit, he cited the Supreme Court Central Bank and Stoneridge decisions as compelling the dismissal of the investors’ class action. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]