Search for: "Corn v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2010, 12:37 am by Michael Geist
  First, there is the claim that "even popcorn sellers are struggling to stay alive" in light the current state of Canadian copyright law. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 10:59 am by Russell Jackson
  The class was defined as "[a]ll persons or entities who, within the State of New York, purchased for personal consumption and not for resale or assignment, a Snapple beverage marketed, advertised, and promoted as 'All Natural,' but that contained [high fructose corn syrup] from October 10, 2001 to January 1, 2009. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:53 am
  The Sixth Circuit had only yet adopted the competition theory of functionality in the case of Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision in Schirmer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
The proof is viewed at this procedural point in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment (see Kropp v Corning, Inc., 69 AD3d 1211, 1212, 893 N.Y.S.2d 371 [2010]). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:52 am by David Bernstein
This resulted in some very bad lawyering, including the briefing in Hopkins v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:25 pm by FDABlog HPM
  For example, FDA has reportedly stated that high fructose corn syrup may be “natural” or not, depending on how the syrup is manufactured. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:38 pm
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog Upcoming CLE event: The Impact of Iasenza v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:00 am
See Corning Glass Works v. [read post]