Search for: "Cross v. Allen"
Results 301 - 320
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
Supreme Court Cases MEDELLIN v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Lust v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Supreme Court‘s recent decision in Pritchard v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
See Mock v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 30, 2008 US v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm
DLA Piper provides a summary of the recently published Recommended Model Contractual Clauses for cross-border transfers of personal data. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
This newest update includes leading cases ranging from the classic 1970s landmark judgment in Klass and others v Germany to the Haščák v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 31 July 2023, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) refused permission to appeal against the sentences of two Just Stop Oil protestors who scaled the bridge at the Dartford crossing, R. v Trowland & Anor [2023] EWCA Crim 919. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Allen, No. 06-5077 "Defendants' sentences resulting from their robbery of rare books from a university's special collections library and attempts to sell them at auction are vacated and remanded for resentencing pursuant to the government's cross-appeal, where the district court erred by excluding objects dropped in a stairwell from its valuation of loss, and correspondingly, from its computation of the sentencing range. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2) (DeBund) Beer and… [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
Storey v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
On 21 December 2021, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1952, allowing the Claimant’s cross-appeal to serve out his data protection claim against the US-based defendant news organisation and journalists. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Salazar, No. 07-40683 Conviction and sentence for witness tampering are affirmed where: 1) conviction was based on sufficient evidence; 2) an objection to the application of a cross-reference to a sentencing guideline was waived; 3) the penalty provisions of the witness-tampering statute were correctly applied; and 4) the proper burden of proof was applied in determining sentence enhancements. . [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 29, 2008 US v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 12:03 am
Neil Foster, Law and Religion Australia: The meaning of “sex” – in the UK and Australia: comparing and contrasting the judgments in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers and Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] FCA 960. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 6:14 am
Faulkner Literary Rights, LLC v. [read post]
