Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 16,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
At the point they are subjected press attention, the children are typically traumatised by the crossing and may also be re-traumatised by being taken captive by border officials (especially where there is a history of state brutality in their countries of origin). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
This term stated that customers must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis) and was included within Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) issued with approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance policies. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]