Search for: "DAVIS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
In recent times, the Supreme Court ruling in Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
See Soke v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
Davis, 885 F.2d at 522. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:00 am
In Hill v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm
Davis L. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Davis, 510 U.S. 1315, 1317 (1994) (Blackmun, J., in chambers) (citation omitted); Lugosch v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:57 pm
(Not that any of this likely practically matters much anyway since both sentences were in California. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:44 pm
Russo and Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” Minor v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Tooey v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 5:07 am
Seth Davis at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law (sethdavis@berkeley.edu). [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
