Search for: "Davies v. Miller"
Results 301 - 320
of 570
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2014, 9:58 am
Davis, and Coffy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Davis 14-197Issue: Whether Miller v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:24 pm
Davis 14-197Issue: Whether Miller v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:25 pm
Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, 514 So.2d 807 (La. 1987) which found that the administration of a flu shot did not fall within the scope of La. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Davis 8. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 6:00 pm
State of the Creative Series: Interview with the CEO & CCO at StrawberryFrog – New York lawyer Ronald Urbach of Davis & Gilbert on his blog, Madison Ave Insights The Defense Amicus Briefs Submitted To The SCOTUS In EEOC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Chelsy Davy was driving Prince Harry “nuts” with 60 calls and texts in a month, according to Goodman in an e-mail. :: O – Old Bailey. [read post]
