Search for: "Davis v. U.s.*"
Results 301 - 320
of 730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), rather than Strickland v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
McDonough v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
This opinion goes a very long way toward cutting back the expansive definition of "testimonial" statements - and therefore the range of evidence excluded by the Confrontation Clause - that had been stated in Davis v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
Nor was it like Porter v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Such a claim could be viable under Title VII and Section 1981 if properly pleaded and proven, the court explained, denying the employer’s motion to dismiss with leave to refile (Davis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Hill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
The second new relist, Davis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Davis 17-6883 Issue: Whether—when the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm
Differentiating Prior Cases Myriad directed the court to cases allowing patents on compounds found within living organisms, such as Parke-Davis & Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:40 am
" quoting Davis v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am
The final Rule uses a definition of discriminatory "sexual harassment" that closely tracks this Court's definition of that term in Davis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Rehaif v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm
" Gardner v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:30 pm
The plaintiffs are represented by EFF, Davis, Wright Tremaine LLP, Walters Law Group, and Daphne Keller. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:12 pm
During his sentencing, the District Court held he was subject to the fifteen-year mandatory minimum (180-month) sentence under the ACCA.After the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Johnson v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly held that the alleged instructional error was harmful and that Davis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
