Search for: "Day v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 301 - 320 of 648
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:43 pm
Sono altresì oggetto di modifica la disciplina del cd. regionalismo differenziato e del potere sostitutivo dello Stato nei confronti degli enti territoriali.La revisione del titolo V non trova applicazione nei confronti delle Regioni a statuto speciale e delle Province autonome sino alla revisione dei rispettivi statuti, sulla base di intese con gli enti interessati.La riforma prevede altresì la soppressione del CNEL. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  Their cost estimates are 10x higher than the one I used and if correct suggest that even 10% is a generous estimate.] [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Bode v Mundell ([2016] EWHC 2533 (QB)). [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there was a pre-trial review in the case of Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd, before Sir David Eady. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 9:44 am by Ellie Ismaili, Olswang LLP
Background This case concerns the alleged maladministration of a GP’s practice in Northern Ireland and its implications on the correct interpretation of the powers of Northern Ireland’s Commissioner of Complaints. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  This is more problematic and ties in with the code of practice issued by the Information Commissioner’s Office on the issue of surveillance cameras, which is the document widely shared online. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
The FTC steered this case into its in-house adjudication process, so the case will be heard before an FTC administrative law judge with appeals going to the FTC Commissioners before this case can be heard in federal court. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
Collins called for an investigation into conflicts of interest at the DOJ on its handling of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, and was he ever correct. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Ultimately many of the technical defects in Eskridge's appeal were cured consistent with the advisory given to Eskridge by the Commissioner’s Office of Counsel that “if the corrected version was served and filed within two weeks of July 3, 2012, the appeal would be deemed to have been initiated on the day a copy of the returned petition was personally served upon respondents. [read post]