Search for: "Dental One, Inc." Results 301 - 320 of 486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
One such contract is with Daytop Village Inc. under which OASAS paid Daytop about $97 million through the end of 2009. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
On one website, applicant's product was not referred to as a "pet treat," but was listed under "dental products" as a "dental additive." [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 3:58 am by Lorene Park
He also said, at one point that he was going to use his “man power” to take her down. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:58 am by Ron Coleman
 Back to John: The TTAB has vacated its precedential decision in Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:01 pm by WIMS
Nations agreed to install the Best Available Technologies on new power plants and facilities with plans to be drawn up to bring emissions down from existing ones. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm by WIMS
Access complete information on the Negotiating Process, the upcoming INC 5 meeting and previous INC meetings (click here). [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 2:30 pm by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
An entity wholly owned by one or more physicians licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459, chiropractic physicians licensed under chapter 460, or dentists licensed under chapter 466 or by such practitioners and the spouse, parent, child, or sibling of such practitioners. c. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:33 pm by Mary Beth Gettins
Is a dental implant really the best solution? [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:08 am by John L. Welch
Some say that one may predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion case just by looking at the marks and the goods or services involved. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
” 3 “Deliver” or “delivery” is defined as “the actual, constructive, or attempted transfer from one person to another of a controlled substance, whether or not there is an agency relationship. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:31 am by Administrator
On Dec. 15, 2000, one of the insurance companies which the Plan had contracted with to provide benefits, Prudential Financial Inc., announced to its policyholders that it would be undergoing a demutualization, and as part of that demutualization, the Plan received 217,222 shares of Prudential stock with a value of $27.50 per share. [read post]