Search for: "Doe 35" Results 301 - 320 of 17,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2012, 10:50 am by JT
  See,  Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v Metlife Auto & Home, 35 Misc.3d 1203(A)(Civ. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:25 pm
Curators of the University of Missouri, et al. the Federal Circuit held that the Eleventh Amendment does not shield the University from appeal of the USPTO's interference decision in favor of the University under 35 USC §146 to change the outcometo the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
"... using the following methodology:" Post-Graduate Success:  50%Employment Rate:  22.5%Super Lawyers:  12.5%Partners in NLJ 200:  10%Bar Passage:  5%Student Satisfaction:  35%RateMyProfessors.com:  20%Princeton Review:  15%Affordability and Diversity:  15%Debt:  10%Diversity:  5% Some of those factors are incredibly lame/immensely manipulable, but I suppose I should like it because my school does well on it. [read post]
., on remand from the Supreme Court, the Federal Circuit broadened the circumstances under which a party can be liable for direct infringement under 35 USC § 271(a) even if it does not perform all steps of a... [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Sarah Burstein, Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law Over the past few years, I’ve had various people ask me if 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:56 am by Alex Basilevsky
In his example of the 65% efficient irrigation system, the other 35% of the water that does not go to the crops is not necessarily lost or destroyed. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
The amendment does not change the purpose of Rule 35(b) or require a departure from the longstanding practice of interpreting the rule in lockstep with § 3553(e) and § 5K1.1. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 6:53 am by Docket Navigator
Unlike the patent in Enfish which apparently disclosed a new method of building a database, here, no aspect of the [patent-in-suit] does enough to remove to claims from the realm of the abstract. . . . [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:52 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
That is more people than are awaiting execution in about half of the 35 states that have the death penalty. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:15 am by Simon Lester
… We are bound by our previous decisions in Timken and Corus, which held that § 1677(35)(A) does not unambiguously preclude—or require—Commerce to use zeroing methodology. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:26 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
According to Carter, the Board correctly interpreted § 135(b)(1) in holding that “establishing support for post- critical date claims does not entail looking at material limitations of the patented claims. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:43 am
 According to page 35 of the MPRE's information booklet, and according to someone at the MPRE with whom I just spoke on the phone, the MPRE test incorporates rule changes no earlier than one year after they are approved. [read post]