Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 301 - 320 of 12,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2012, 4:57 am by Russ Bensing
  Can you make the argument that the law “simply does not apply” when the facts are legally insufficient to convict the defendant? [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 2:15 am
While the defendant fought this on appeal, the Supremes came down with Lopez v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
  But at the same time, I'm not a huge fan of the "letting the defendant assert a defense to try to avoid a decade in prison will take too much of our valuable time" argument. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm by Stan Gibson
The Court concluded that although counsel for Defendants did not violate any ethical or legal standards through his communications with Mr. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm by Stan Gibson
The Court concluded that although counsel for Defendants did not violate any ethical or legal standards through his communications with Mr. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by A. Brian Albritton
The Eleventh Circuit does not explain how the defendants’ Medicare billing practices were material but defendants’ Medicaid billings were not. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:41 pm by Jon Katz
How does, or does not, Roper help capital defendants who committed then-capital crimes when juveniles and took non-parolable life sentence deals pre-Roper in order to avoid the death penalty? [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
In that circumstance, even though the presumption does not posit the real reason for the later denial, it does produce a result ("looking through" to the last reasoned decision) that is the correct one for federal habeas courts. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 7:48 am
Here's Bloomberg's followup story on yesterday's argument in LaRue v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is DFSB Kollective Co. v. [read post]