Search for: "Does 1-32"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2021, 3:48 am
However, "if the TTAB does not consider the marketplace usage of the parties’ marks, the TTAB's decision should 'have no later preclusive effect in a suit where actual usage in the marketplace is the paramount issue.'" Id. at 156–57 (quoting McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 32:101). [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
., the Patent Trialand Appeal Board cancelled claims 1–7 and 32–42 of the’704 patent based on determinations of anticipation andobviousness. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:23 pm
All the 13s, 14s, 15s and 16s. 3 12s. 2 11s. 2 10s. 2 9s. 2 8s. 2 7s. 2 6s. 1 5. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:06 pm
What does this mean for Indian nationals? [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:11 pm
In other words, the public does not support “revenue neutral” corporate tax reform. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
It held that because the City’s discretion under its local design review ordinance does not extend to addressing environmental effects it does not implicate CEQA, and therefore the City’s reliance on the CEQA Guidelines’ Class 32 exemption was unnecessary. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:11 pm
” […] As shown in Figure 1, the intelligent gateway (V-I/G 32) has a database (DB 31) that contains information about multiple home networks, including short-code translation tables, subscriber profile data, and roaming patterns. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The library further argues that Election Law § 8-312 does not apply to school district elections. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The library further argues that Election Law § 8-312 does not apply to school district elections. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
§ 32(a)(5) and (8). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Given this, the fact an anti-PD-1 antibody is not made or tested in the priority document does not matter (para [125]). [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding and Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division disagreed with Plaintiff's contention that Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) does not apply to the records demanded held by the custodian, explaining:1. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding and Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division disagreed with Plaintiff's contention that Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) does not apply to the records demanded held by the custodian, explaining:1. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
If the patented feature does not drive the demand for the product, sales would be lost even if the offending feature were absent from the accused product. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
Claim 1 is thus obvious over Herbst. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:53 pm
Consumers also can contact Kraft Foods Consumer Relations at 1-800-310-3704 between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44 36 32 50… [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:47 am
***DSM Directive Series #1: Do Member States have to transpose the value gap provision and does the YouTube referral matter? [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:43 pm
Women occupy 32% of the seats on the states' highest courts. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:49 am
Practically speaking, three primary scenarios will arise:1. [read post]
