Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 301 - 320
of 9,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
§ 41.50(b), we enter NEW GROUNDS OF REJECTION against: (1) claims 32, 43,and 44 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
The PTAB also found the patent claims to be invalid in the CBM under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:18 pm
§ 156(e)(1). [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:34 am
Does 1-24, Slip Op., No. 21 C 514 (N.D. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:51 am
Published: 12/8/2014 11:35 AM [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:00 am
Grant, Islamic Law, International Law, and Non-International Armed Conflict in Syria, 35 Boston University International Law Journal 1-37 (2017). [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
Examiners should now reject product claims drawn solely to naturally occurring nucleic acids or fragments thereof, whether isolated or not, as being ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:45 am
Has the applicant exhausted domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention? [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:11 pm
As to anticipation For a reference to anticipate a claim under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 11:43 am
Stat. 35/15. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
This question was raised (and answered) in the Supreme Court of Appeal's judgment in the case of Legator McKenna Inc and another v Shea and others 2010(1) SA 35 (SCA).The relevant facts, simplified, were as follows:- Mr Mckenna was appointed as curator bonis for Ms Shea who was severely injured in a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:34 am
In those instances where it is not clear whether the claimed narrower range is a limitation, a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph should be made. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 2:31 pm
The Board reasonably concluded that Edmondson does not expressly disclose the 1:1 sitagliptin DHP salt. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm
The main request therefore does not meet the requirements of A 123(2) and has to be refused. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:38 am
Whether claim 1 of the 08/833,892 patent application claims patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:45 am
If still unsuccessful, the applicant then has a choice of either (1) filing a civil action in federal court or (2) appealing directly to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:01 am
According to defendant, he showed good cause because Juror No. 35's account suggested that Juror No. 35 could produce evidence of juror misconduct. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
Agapito, 620 F.2d 324, 333-35 (2d Cir.) [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:34 am
” Though the packaging does state that efficacy in women 35 and older hasn’t been clearly established, Endometrin doesn’t have a Black Box warning. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:21 am
While we thus construe § 3(n)(1) asapplying the new AIA provisions only to new applications,it does not follow that § 3(n)(1) requires application of pre-AIA judicial review provisions to old applications.(...)For interferences declared after September 15, 2012, thisprovision explicitly authorizes pre-AIA § 141 review, butunlike AIA § 6(f)(c)(3), does not authorize pre-AIA § 146review. [read post]
