Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
Id.at 201,108 S.Ct. at 2347 (citing United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
This new policy by the Hillsborough County State attorney's office is based on science. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
New York State Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO, United University Professions, Police Benevolent Association of the New York State Troopers, Inc., New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union, Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al., Court Attorneys Association of the City of New York et al., New York State Police Investigators Association, Local 4 IUPA, AFL-CIO et al., amici curiae. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
New York State Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO, United University Professions, Police Benevolent Association of the New York State Troopers, Inc., New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union, Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al., Court Attorneys Association of the City of New York et al., New York State Police Investigators Association, Local 4 IUPA, AFL-CIO et al., amici curiae. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
But it does represent the continuation of our quite singular relations with this state. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
After hearing from Live Gold, he asked, "State, why shouldn't you be responsible for attorney's fees[?] [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
You can read the executive order here and below: By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
You can watch that discussion here and below: You can read the executive order here and below: By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
On September 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 11:16 am
(d) Injunctive relief (1) When it appears to the Attorney General that any domestic concern to which this section applies, or officer, director, employee, agent, or stockholder thereof, is engaged, or about to engage, in any act or practice constituting a violation of subsection (a) or (i) of this section, the Attorney General may, in his discretion, bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States to enjoin such… [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Supreme Court granted the Town's motion to dismiss the petition, finding that: [1] TA resignation was effective; and [2] TA never sought the consent of the Town Clerk to withdraw or cancel his resignation in accordance with Public Officers Law §31(4). [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Supreme Court granted the Town's motion to dismiss the petition, finding that: [1] TA resignation was effective; and [2] TA never sought the consent of the Town Clerk to withdraw or cancel his resignation in accordance with Public Officers Law §31(4). [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
”#4 Why did the DA make the NPA made public? [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:36 am
The answers to questions 1 and 4 are, unfortunately, allegedly, yes. [read post]
