Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 11:06 am
Here are three reasons liberals need moderates: 1. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:32 am
(ECF No. 54-1 at 108–109). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
Age plays no role in steps 1 through 4. [read post]
CJEU on recognition of extrajudicial divorces, case Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, C-646/20
15 Nov 2022, 2:40 am
It does not happen often that the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice delivers a judgment on interpretation of EU private international law instruments. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
”), col. 3 ll. 38–39 (“The ECR-MBE system used in thisinvention is shown in FIG. 1. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:42 am
However, the new numbers will help soften the blow once California does implement. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:45 am
However, the new numbers will help soften the blow once California does implement. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:47 am
Indeed, claim 1 does not comprise any technical feature characterizing the "reference voltage generation circuit" other than by the fact that it is located within the sensor holder and by the fact that it supplies a "reference voltage" to a sensor. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 1:34 pm
” The NYAG has indicated to Judge Preska that it does not take a position on her entry of a Rule 54(b) judgment against the CFPB but that, if the court were to do so, it would oppose any request by RD Legal Funding for a stay of the district court proceeding. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 1:34 pm
” The NYAG has indicated to Judge Preska that it does not take a position on her entry of a Rule 54(b) judgment against the CFPB but that, if the court were to do so, it would oppose any request by RD Legal Funding for a stay of the district court proceeding. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:13 pm
N.J.S.A. 54:35-1. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In the decision under appeal it was held that it does, because the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot claim priority from the US application No. 835,799 […]. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:31 pm
., and John Doe Corporation (lettuce producer), on behalf of Zachary Nitz and Ebone Colbert-Taylor. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:36 am
The Court does not read Rule 63 to address the situation here, where Judge Murphy received the parties’ briefs, held a hearing, issued a written order ruling on the parties’ arguments and dismissing claims, and then left the bench. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:13 pm
J.A. 5467–68, 5513–14, 5553–54. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
[1] While undefined in the record, it appears that “restoration of health” is a category of employee leave offered by respondent similar to Family and Medical Leave Act leave (Douyon v New York City Dept. of Educ., 665 Fed Appx 54, 56, n.1 [2d Cir 2016] [summary order]) [2] Petitioner also complains that he should have been placed on involuntary leave rather than directed to utilize “restoration of health leave. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
[1] While undefined in the record, it appears that “restoration of health” is a category of employee leave offered by respondent similar to Family and Medical Leave Act leave (Douyon v New York City Dept. of Educ., 665 Fed Appx 54, 56, n.1 [2d Cir 2016] [summary order]) [2] Petitioner also complains that he should have been placed on involuntary leave rather than directed to utilize “restoration of health leave. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:33 am
But what does this mean? [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
For this reason the OD was wrong to hold that the PRP applied only to requests on whose allowability a decision had been taken by the Board of Appeal […]. [2.3.2] The reasoning of G 4/93 also does not imply that, as the opponent argued […], the PRP prevails only on condition that the factual situation at the time of the first instance decision is the same as on appeal by the opponent. [read post]
