Search for: "Downes & Company v. Church" Results 301 - 320 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 there is an application in the case of WXY v Gewanter  - this is, as we understand, not related to the handing down of the reserved judgment mentioned below. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:05 am by Robin E. Shea
The plaintiff in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
" The chief fact at issue on ECUSA's and its rump diocese's motions was whether or not ECUSA is a "hierarchical" church, i.e., a church in which, as the United States Supreme Court expressed it in its 1872 decision in Watson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am by Laura Sandwell
For individual case details please visit the following: BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance , Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company… [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In 2008, the Sixth Circuit found in Phelps-Roper v Strickland (22 August 2008) that a similar law to those struck down this year was valid. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:11 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Anyone desiring a copy of this opinion by Judge Nealon in the case of Church of the Forgotten Souls v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Tomorrow’s topic will be Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Since then, the chatter on the issue of strategic litigation against public participation (SLAPP) appears to have died down. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am by Conor McEvily
Holder and Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v EEOC. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Read broadly, the decision strikes a blow to the ability of consumers to bring suits against companies, both inside and outside of arbitration. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
The plaintiffs tried to get around this argument by dropping all French defendants from the suit, naming as defendants only the U.S. companies that manufactured various components to the crashed Airbus 330. [read post]