Search for: "Doyle v. Doyle"
Results 301 - 320
of 692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2009, 7:27 am
Doyle (Wis. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:07 am
The court explained that a notice of claim is only required “when money damages are sought, citing Ruocco v Doyle, 38 AD2d 132.Overcoming this hurdle, however, did not result in the court's considering the merits of Kahn's claim as the Appellate Division then found that her action was time-barred because she filed her Article 78 petition after the statute of limitations had expired.The court said that a petition to challenge the termination of probationary… [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:46 am
Luther Kemble, No. 100,824 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal; Agg Indecent LibertiesCarl Folsom, IIIImproper judicial comment on credibility of witnessProsecutorial misconduct (Doyle violation)Failure to charge or instruct on age of defendantState v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
Arizona v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am
This morning the Court heard oral arguments in Welch v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Ben Challis (1709 Blog) was quick off the mark with news that Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate (the "Sherlock Holmes" case) is not heading for a US Supreme Court ruling, Tara Aaron (Aaron Sanders) has potted this too, for IP Breakdown. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:33 pm
Supreme Court in Hurst v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:50 am
Attachments: van Schewick 2019 H.R.1096 v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
On Tuesday morning, the Court will hear argument in Gross v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 10:08 am
Cir. 1995) (holding that even though Chu’s “application claims to be a CIP of the Doyle patent,” some claims were not supported by Doyle alone, so for those claims “the Doyle patent was properly relied on as prior art”) Santarus, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” “The closest parallel is a Ninth Circuit case called Ellis v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:11 pm
Doyle]Judge Norma Ogle affirmed concurrent life sentences for first-degree premeditated murder. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Thus, “‘when it comes to Indian affairs, state courts are courts of limited jurisdiction'” (Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d at 296, quoting Bowen v Doyle, 880 FSupp 99, 114 [WD NY], affd 230 F3d 525 [2d Cir]). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
Dermot Doyle dismissed the opposition. [read post]
