Search for: "E. Arnold" Results 301 - 320 of 980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
 On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of Lyrica. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:09 pm by Bill Marler
Nice - Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger - For vetoing SB 201 - Minnesota Health Department - Team Diarrhea helped solve the salmonella/tomato/pepper mystery as well as the raw frozen chicken entrees making people sick. - Fresh Express - For a clean outbreak record, donating a healthy sum to research, and sponsoring a technical conference on E. coli in leafy greens. - Bioniche - For the Development of an E. coli vaccine. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 3:53 pm
Nice - Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger – For vetoing SB 201 - Minnesota Health Department – Team Diarrhea helped solve the salmonella/tomato/pepper mystery as well as the raw frozen chicken entrees making people sick. - Fresh Express - For a clean outbreak record, donating a healthy sum to research, and sponsoring a technical conference on E. coli in leafy greens. - Bioniche - For the Development of an E. coli vaccine. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:00 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
That’s because officers with the university police force and the North Carolina Alcohol Law Enforcement office responded to complaints about a wild party going on at the Chi Phi frat house on E. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 1:11 am
 Copyright person of the yearLord Justice ArnoldThis year’s copyright person is someone who: (1) has been pivotal to shaping – inter alia - domestic copyright law; (2) has had a profound and fruitful dialogue with the CJEU on a range of different IP issues over the years; and (3) has influenced other countries’ courts and approaches, particularly with regard to online enforcement.It is Sir Richard Arnold, who – this year – has been elevated from the High… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
The decision handed down this morning (not yet online, but available if you e-mail the AmeriKat), relates to how the retrial of the case originally heard by Mr Justice Arnold will run. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
In the particular case at hand, s73(2)(b) and (3) means that copyright is [was] not infringed "if and to the extent that the broadcast is made for reception in the area in which it is re-transmitted by cable and forms part of a qualifying service".The broadcasters appealed Arnold J's decision. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Akazawa, 520 F.3d at 1357 (citing Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:12 am by Andres
The claimants in the case are Sky and the E&W Cricket Board (EWCB), which own the copyright in most live cricket broadcasts. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:13 am by OBABL Staff
Christian Co-Chair of the Board Hogan Lovells William E. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 6:02 am
Posted by Mark Emanuel and Greg Arnold, Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC, on Tuesday, February 8, 2022 Editor's Note: Mark Emanuel and Greg Arnold are managing directors at Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC. [read post]
24 May 2009, 4:38 pm
There may well be a lot more to emerge about Arnold J’s ruling itself – as you’ll see from the IPKat’s update, there are at least 482 paragraphs to scramble through (put our Federal Court to shame (thankfully!)). [read post]
Mitchell Boyarsky, a Director in the Gibbons Employment & Labor Law Department, and Brittany E. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
The Development Contract was governed by and to be construed in accordance with English law and the parties agreed to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts (clause 8(e)).6. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am by Graham Smith
  Actually no one has asked them about making available and copyright yet, though your Mr Justice Arnold has held that targeting applies. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 3:59 am by Administrator
Une somme de 100 000 $ est accordée à Ludmer et une autre de 50 000 $ est accordée à Steinberg pour atteinte à la réputation. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:33 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Board had issued consistent decisions such as,  In re Arnold, 105 USPQ2d 1953, 1954 (TTAB 2013) (“It is well settled that the title of a single creative work is not considered a trademark and is, therefore, unregistrable…. [read post]