Search for: "Empire v. Commercial" Results 301 - 320 of 751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2013, 9:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialty Store v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Real Estate Broker 3 Penelope Ifill The Corcoran Group Real Estate 3 Lynn Kremsky RDK Appraisals Appraiser 3 Joel Klein LXP Investor / Developer 3 salvatore merante all bronx real estate inc re broker,appraiser,accountant 2 Walt Egelanian DJM Realty Real Estate Disposition 3 Jonathan Arnold Empire Buildings Estate Inc Broker 2 Francisco Diaz Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage - Residential 2 Nir Zeer Danrich RE Broker 3 Miri Zoarez … [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Shamnad Basheer
A true copy of excerpts from the decision in Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
Because, as they say in the commercial, one more day is priceless. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
The Ninth Circuit uses the extrinsic/intrinsic test created in the Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:32 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
It's possible the corporations or individuals benefitting from the awards focused their efforts on developing nonpatentable innovations or commercial applications for existing inventions. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 10:28 am by alath
Similarly, prohibitively large liquidated damages can also operate as de facto non-compete clauses (Wegmann v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
Sticky Arbitration Clauses We present the results of the first empirical study of the extent to which businesses have switched to arbitration after AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:19 am by Ray Dowd
 Spain put the art collection into a "foundation" and tried to insulate it from claims from an American Jew named Claude Cassirer whose grandmother Lilly had been spoliated by the Nazis in the widely-reported case Cassirer v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But access is now potentially on both sides of the equation, not just incentives v. access. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm by Eric
The court’s presumption here, an empirical question that the court doesn’t defend, is off-base. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
” It was “largely an empirical exercise” to identify new “promising” compounds. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:17 am by SHG
” United States v. [read post]