Search for: "FLOWERS v. FLOWERS" Results 301 - 320 of 1,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
If your personal injury lawyer instructs you not to file a claim with your health insurer concerning your medical care, you may instead be in the hands of a “lien doctor” [Sara Randazzo, WSJ, paywall] Supreme Court passes up opportunity to decide whether the Constitution’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to business defendants, and also whether a state can conjure an excessive fine out of existence by conceptually slicing it up into smaller daily fines [Ilya Shapiro on Cato… [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 8:33 am by Amy Howe
The justices called for the views of the federal government in CACI Premier Technology v. al Shimari, a case brought against CACI, a government contractor that provided civilian interrogators at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, by Iraqi citizens who allege that they were abused by CACI employees while detained there. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 and January 17 conferences) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by CAFE
Marco Rubio’s tweet about Bolton’s testimony, 1/6/20 United States’ Supplemental Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing, U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
The NFIB blog argues that in Seila Law v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 10:26 am
According to settled case law, a sign must be refused registration if at least one of its possible meanings characterises the existence of an absolute ground for refusal (see for example, T‑428/17, Alpine Welten Die Bergführer v EUIPO). [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Frascati Shipping Co., Ltd., Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:15 am by Bob Ambrogi
” Why make me wade through the muck to find the flower. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Fraser, Jennifer Perkins, and Jonathan Scruggs, and earlier; And speaking of which: SCOTUS should resolve “expressive wedding vendor” issue once and for all [Ilya Shapiro and Michael Collins on Cato certiorari brief in (latest stage of) Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]