Search for: "Fair v. Poole" Results 301 - 320 of 1,026
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm by INFORRM
This direct connection between Hain and the law firm arguably falls within the Porter v Magill test of whether a ‘fair-minded and informed observer would think there was real possibility of bias’. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poole Borough Council v GN (through his litigation friend, ‘The Official Solicitor’) & Anor, heard 16-17 Jul 2018. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Examples of such obligations include the privacy and data security rules of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), the Internal Revenue Code and other tax laws, federal and state consumer debt and information, electronic crime, data security and identity theft statutes; federal and state trade secret and intellectual property laws; and others, for which violations often equal or substantially exceed the civil monetary penalty liability that commonly arise under the… [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:12 am by Doug Cornelius
Sources: SEC Stops Fraudulent ICO That Falsely Claimed SEC Approval Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
Justice Nakatsuru is known for his easy-to-read, fair, and principled judgments. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
Justice Nakatsuru is known for his easy-to-read, fair, and principled judgments. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poole Borough Council v GN (through his litigation friend, ‘The Official Solicitor’) & Anor, heard 16-17 Jul 2018. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Phelan, 333 U.S. 6, 10 (1948), described as “a drastic measure and at times the equivalent of banishment or exile,” and in Ng Fung Ho v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Phelan, 333 U.S. 6, 10 (1948), described as “a drastic measure and at times the equivalent of banishment or exile,” and in Ng Fung Ho v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 10:04 am
Peter Martinsson noted the Avanci pool as a step in that direction.Gertjan asked about the consequences of late declaration (noting the Apple v Core Wireless decision in the Federal Circuit). [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am by MOTP
However, equitable relief is not available merely because it might appear expedient or generally fair that some recompense be afforded for an unfortunate loss to the claimant, or because the benefits to the person sought to be charged amount to a windfall. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 8:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, the retirees’ claim of unlawful age discrimination under FEHA fails as a matter of law (Harris v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:47 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
Whether it would be fair, just and reasonable to impose the duty would depend on the facts. [read post]