Search for: "Ford Motor Co., Appeal of" Results 301 - 320 of 504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
  Although the FDA’s conclusion is not binding on us, we think it deserves serious consideration.Id. at 177-78.Another thorough treatment of the issue is in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 50 AD3d at 673; Chrostowski v Chow, 37 AD3d 638, 639; Beepat v James, 303 AD2d 345, 346; Hanna v Ford Motor Co., 252 AD2d 478). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:18 am by Julie Lam
In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) in Vrooman v Ford Motor Co, No. 142824, and remanded the case to the Board of Magistrates for additional findings of fact and conclusions of law, for the reasons stated in the WCAC dissenting opinion. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm by Schachtman
Ford Motor Co., et al. (120954/2000; In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, Index No. 40000/88).] [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Where the relief sought is equitable in nature, the statute of limitations is six years, and where the relief sought is purely monetary, the statute of limitations is three years (see Monaghan v Ford Motor Co., 71 AD3d 848). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:15 am by Philip Thomas
Over the weekend I compared the Court's decision to the Mississippi Supreme Court's 2007 opinion in the Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:31 am by John Day
Ford Motor Co., 461 F.3d 557, 566 (5th Cir. 2006) (“When the demonstrative evidence is offered only as an illustration of general scientific principles, not as a reenactment of disputed events, it need not pass the substantial similarity test. [read post]