Search for: "GMBH"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
Schiedmayer Celesta GmbH. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 3:08 am
Zeitneu GmbH (the losing party in a non-infringement action before the Court of Venice, Italy), filed an application f or a declaration of invalidity against the 3D Moon Boots trademark of Tecnica Group SA (picture on the left). [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 2:45 am
. / Parkamo GmbH), which applied the guidelines set out in the recent CJEU ruling in C-762/19 CV-Online Latvia. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:42 pm
Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 1:29 am
FN; Evest Limited FN; INZMO Europe GmbH FN. [6] COND 2 [7] See CP21/28 New cancellation and variation power: Changes to the Handbook and Enforcement Guide [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 12:41 am
Ford-Werke GmbH, case no. 44 O 17132/21, over EP2248383 on a "method and apparatus for indicating deactivation of semi-persistent scheduling" (originally filed by Thomson)The case numbers indicate that both Sisvel v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v European Flipper /… [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 4:01 am
CeramTec GmbH, Cancellations Nos. 92058781 and 92058796 [Consolidated proceedings for cancellation of two registrations for the color pink applied to the entire surface of hip joint balls, on the grounds of Section 2(e)(5) functionality and fraud.] [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:47 am
Ultimately, it decided that they could, disagreeing with the EUIPO’s Opposition Division [Opposition Division decision here, BoA decision here].Background On 27th September 2019, European Flipper / Pinball Factory GmbH applied to register the following logo as an EU trade mark: The application covered the following goods and services and was published for opposition on 3rd October 2019:Class 11: Camping stoves.Class 12: Camping cars; Mobile homes [caravans]; Camper vans; Camping… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:03 am
Ethypharm GmbH (4a O 53/20) and betapharm Arzneimittel GmbH (4a O 13/21)? [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:34 am
Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d 788, 789, 51 N.Y.S.3d 183, 185 [2d Dept 2017] quoting Luk Lamellen U Kupplungbau GmbH v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:45 am
Sprick Gmbh & Ho appealed to the Federal Court of Justice. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 6:43 am
" See KID-Systeme GmbH v. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 8:54 am
GmbH. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents the tenth volume in his rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
., The Impact of the Law on Character Formation, Ethical Education, and the Communication of Values in Late Modern Pluralistic Societies, (Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt GmbH, 2021), 15-30).John Witte, 'Foreword,' to Paul Valliere and Randall Poole, eds., Law and the Christian Tradition in Modern Russia, (London: Routledge, 2021, ix-xi).John Hasnas, Free Speech on Campus: Countering the Climate of Fear, (Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy,… [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:07 am
Circuit Judge O’Malley filed a dissenting opinion (Biogen International GmbH v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 4:16 pm
The outcome For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the four final written decisions that determined unpatentability based on Steenfeldt-Jensen: IPR2018-01670, IPR2018-01676, IPR2018-01678, and IPR2019-00979. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:16 am
Following the latest trade mark judgment between Monster Energy Co. and Frito-Lay Trading Company GmbH (see here for a previous decision), Monster came away licking its wounds.In two joined decisions, the General Court considered non-use within the meaning of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 1:09 am
Yet, this approach became popular among other European courts, as well as at the EUIPO.The two theories existed on equal standing throughout the EU until the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court submitted a reference for a preliminary ruling in C-395/16 DOCERAM [see also a 2018 comment to the case from The IPKat].The reference originated from a claim by Doceram GmbH against CeramTec GmbH for infringement of 17 Community designs registered by Doceram for centering welding pins… [read post]
