Search for: "GRANT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES"
Results 301 - 320
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
Stamer is recognized, internationally, nationally and locally for her more than 25 years of work, advocacy, education and publications on cutting edge health and managed care, employee benefit, human resources and related workforce, insurance and financial services, and health care matters. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant, Earl of Seafield & Ors, heard 18 – 19 November 2013. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury, along with their respective Secretaries (Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury, along with their respective Secretaries (Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
Mobile health care, referred to colloquially as “mHealth,” has been touted as the next big thing in health care, with Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, declaring mobile health care “the biggest technology breakthrough of our time. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 10:15 am
Health and Human Services Secretary et al. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
In the case, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) attempted to justify its failure to promote an African-American employee to a position for which she had been selected by pointing first to a hiring freeze and subsequent hiring controls placed on HHS, and later to the ultimate elimination of the position. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Mass. 1986)(granting summary judgment), aff’d, 830 F.2d 1190, 1197 (1st Cir. 1987)(distinguishing between chances that “somewhat favor” plaintiff and plaintiff’s burden of showing specific causation by “preponderant evidence”) DeLuca v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:39 am
Secretary Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. [read post]
3rd Circuit Denies Stay Pending Appeal In Small Business Challenge to Contraceptive Coverage Mandate
8 Feb 2013, 1:11 pm
Secretary of U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:26 pm
That is also the lesson taught by the historic use of the Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Secretary’s Section 1115 waiver authority to allow an extraordinary range of state-level experimentation. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
This week’s resolved cases include: Dolan-Powers v The Observer, Clause 1, 14/12/2012 Weston Area Health NHS Trust v Weston, Worle & Somerset Mercury, Clause 1, 10/12/2012 Lord Hunt, chair of the PCC, has appointed Lord Chris Smith (former Labour culture secretary), Simon Jenkins (former editor of the Times) and Lord Phillips (former president of the supreme court) as unpaid special advisers to help set up a new press regulator. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:08 pm
The Dickey Amendment prohibits the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which includes the NIH, from funding research where human embryos are destroyed. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:59 am
CHAPTER IV - CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED). [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:57 pm
This is the most recent decision in the dispute between U.S. researchers in the field of adult stem cells, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:41 am
Secretary Department of Health and Human Services In 2003, Dr. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:38 am
The federal Medicaid law sets a 180-day deadline for filing such an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board, an entity within the Department of Health & Human Services, which runs Medicare. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm
Businesses, individuals, states and federal and state Congressional and regulatory leaders others looking for opportunities to manage these costs should carefully scrutinize how the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) plans to define “essential health benefits” (EHBs). [read post]
