Search for: "Givens v. United States Of America" Results 301 - 320 of 2,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am by Mary B. McCord
Oath Keepers lawyer Kellye SoRelle called Stone a “go-between” for paramilitary groups and Trump-affiliated activists, including Nick Fuentes, the avowed anti-Semitic racist who founded the America First Political Action Conference in 2020. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The United States was a permanent arrangement, created by the people as an aggregated whole rather than by the states. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What was the nature of the Union—in the capital-U sense, meaning that political entity known as the United States of America—in 1819? [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
The Supreme Court has also held, in a 1940 unanimous opinion in Bacardi Corp. of America v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ron DeSantis to accept state residents off Holland America cruise ships, USA Today (last updated April 2, 2020). [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
This is indeed a plausible theory given the fact that Mr. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
And this case was a facile vehicle for such a decision, given the horrific crimes involved. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:00 am by Unknown
It is whether the United States circa 2023, and for the reasonably foreseeable future, can expect to achieve better results by curtailing the power or changing the composition of the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 In June of this year, the Supreme Court of the United States issued four landmark decisions, all decided by 6-3 partisan votes. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States, makes that point only then to go on and draw the distinction. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So this brings up two central questions: First, is it true that a Herculean justice, seeking unequivocal “right answers” to the questions posed by the United States Constitution, will feel forced by her oath of office to recognize a strong protection for the “right to keep and bear arms”? [read post]