Search for: "Grant v. Commissioner of Correction&nbsp" Results 301 - 320 of 482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
A v SSHD (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:30 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; constitutional due process right to fair trial; interpretation of kidnapping statue § 53a-92 under State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 9:28 pm by Sme
Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County, Colorado (10th Cir., November 13, 2014) (affirming dismissal of third amended complaint seeking payment of more overtime because any error was harmless and the county's calculations were correct)  [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:33 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
However, the Supreme Court noted that this interpretation, while correct, is not without difficulties if there is no other power of detention. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am by Jordan Gold
This article will not discuss who might actually be liable for negligence on the part of the league, whether it is the commissioner, the owners of the teams, or whomever else. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:45 pm by Barry Sookman
Customs and Excise Commissioners, [1974] A.C. 133) and Mareva injunctions (derived from the well decision in Mareva Compania Naviera S.A. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:30 am by Attorney Theodore Ronca
(If this seems unbelievable, see “Manticoff v American Building Maintenance”, 63 AD3d 1308 (2009))   Another abuse, which can serve as an example for tens of thousands of others, was a claim in which a worker was granted 11 “final” opportunities to appear. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that "the commissioner was free to find that the choice [Fludd] made was utterly incompatible with her position as correction officer. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 By taking that position, amicus argues, the plaintiff is restricting the scope and flexibility of the statute, since if the plaintiff were correct, the Labor Commissioner cannot seek PAGA penalties on behalf of a single employee. [read post]