Search for: "Grant v. Raymond" Results 301 - 320 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  We did that not too long ago and came up with a new law review article, Samuel Raymond, “Judicial Politics & Medical Device Preemption After Riegel,” 5 N.Y.U.J.L. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court properly granted defendant Litchfield Cavo's motion to dismiss, since there was no evidence that Cavo, as superseding counsel, either contributed to the loss or could have done anything to correct the errors of predecessor counsel (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1 [2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]; Rivas v Raymond Schwartzberg & Assoc., PLLC, 52 AD3d 401 [2008]). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Rosalind English
The Appeal  The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in  Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:31 am
Scoggin of Tiedeken & Scoggin, PC, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Defendant): Raymond D. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by Ray Dowd
All practice, no theory.Copyright Litigation Handbook (Thomson Reuters Westlaw 2015-2016) by Raymond J. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:59 am by WSLL
Davis, Judge.Representing Appellant(Defendant): Justin Kallal of Justin Kallal, PC,Jackson, Wyoming.Representing Appellee(Plaintiff): Raymond W. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 5:59 pm by Amy Howe
Four judges – Chief Judge Lavenski Smith and Judges Steven Colloton, Raymond Gruender and Bobby Shepherd – indicated that they would have granted the state’s motion. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:24 am by Samuel Bray
" APA remedies is a huge and recurring question, and it has new urgency after the Supreme Court's cert grant in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Carolan v Fairfax Media (No.7) [2017] NSWSC 351 McCallum J refused to grant a permanent injunction after a successful libel action where there was no threat to repeat the defamatory imputations. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:03 pm by CMS
As we reported yesterday, the Lord Advocate, the senior Scottish law officer, has sought permission to intervene in these proceedings; that permission has been granted. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:14 am by Ashby Jones
  Not including 12 Uighurs who were released, there have been 14 detainees released pursuant to court orders, that is, due to the grant of habeas writ. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 6:30 am by Raymond Loch
    #8: 1926.453(b)(2)(v) – Fall protection in aerial lifts. [read post]