Search for: "HAND v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY" Results 301 - 320 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/Jfeq4E (Tom Schober) IT and Legal Perspectives on Data Security - bit.ly/JxaydP (Stacy Jackson) IP: Examining the Risks Associated with Corporate Social Media Use – bit.ly/J0rEEK (Marcella Ballard, Deborah Feinblum) Keeping Secrets on Facebook - nyti.ms/JVKEq3 (Somini Sengupta) Lawyers and Social Media: What Could Possibly Go Wrong? [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
In what has become a ritualized performance over the years, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights delivered his statement for the opening of the 32nd session of the U.N. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The judgment in Anglia Research v Finders Genealogists [2016] EWHC 297 (QB), handed down on 17 February 2016 was put on Bailii. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved Judge Lynn Griffin dismissed an appeal in Peter Beswick v Information Commissioner [2022] UKFTT 360 (GRC). [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
Board of Education), has tried to enable localized immigrant bashing, and has proposed crazy attacks on the federal income tax and the Social Security system. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”  On the other hand, those lawyers claim the products are not securities, and the promoters proceed without compliance with the securities laws, which deprives investors of the substantive and procedural investor protection requirements of our securities laws. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Becomes Canada’s Longest-Serving Chief Justice http://t.co/WxpKIS9o3n -> Life on the Social Media Front Line: The legal and ethical challenges facing Online Community Managers http://t.co/YD8WpEJJZj -> eBay Not Liable for Technical Glitch When Seller Doesn't Set Reserve Price — D'Agostino v. eBay http://t.co/2epESgQmu0 -> Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
The City, on the other hand, argued that Civil Service Law §80 controlled and thus Mousseau, rather than Racine, had to be laid off first. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
The City, on the other hand, argued that Civil Service Law §80 controlled and thus Mousseau, rather than Racine, had to be laid off first. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]