Search for: "Higgins v. Higgins"
Results 301 - 320
of 518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Div. 2007) (quoting Higgins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 6:04 am
Higgins v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
A v Governor of Arbour Hill Prison [2006] 4 I.R. 88; [2006] IESC 45. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
The case of King v Sunday Newspapers has been the subject of five judgments in the Courts in Northern Ireland. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
– Newark lawyer Robert Rudnick of Gibbons on the firm’s blog, IP Law Alert Comcast Corporation Appeal Will Permit Justices to Examine Class Certification issues Post-Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
In the Celebrex/Bextra litigation, both sides acknowledged the general acceptance and validity of meta-analysis, for both observational studies and clinical trials, but attacked the other side’s witnesses’ meta-analyses on grounds specific to how they were conducted. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am
., Judges Higgins, Koojimans and Burgenthal, Arrest Warrant case, para 51). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
If the intention is to speed up the eviction process rather than to increase evictions it is not at all clear why the court's discretion to suspend or postpone the eviction has not been retained in circumstances where there is persuasive evidence that the tenant's behaviour will improve, i.e. the only circumstances in which a court should suspend or postpone a possession order under the current discretionary ground (see Manchester City Council v Higgins [2005] EWCA Civ… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
If the intention is to speed up the eviction process rather than to increase evictions it is not at all clear why the court's discretion to suspend or postpone the eviction has not been retained in circumstances where there is persuasive evidence that the tenant's behaviour will improve, i.e. the only circumstances in which a court should suspend or postpone a possession order under the current discretionary ground (see Manchester City Council v Higgins [2005] EWCA Civ… [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:31 am
Now, in Higgins v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am
Happel v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:32 pm
Surely this is so in Israel, whose Supreme Court pronounced on targeted killings in Public Committee against Torture in Israel (2006), and in the United States, whose Supreme Court held in Hamdan v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:41 am
” [Peter Spiro, OJ] New Third Circuit opinion in remanded U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:51 am
” Higgins v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm
For these reasons, iiNet’s inactivity after receipt of the AFACT notices did not give rise to an inference of authorisation (by “countenancing” or otherwise) of any act of primary infringement by its customers. (146) The present case is not one where the conduct of the respondent’s business was such that the primary infringements utilising BitTorrent were “bound” to happen in the sense apparent in Evans v E Hulton & Co Ltd[165], and discussed earlier… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
KF 250 H54 2011 Successful legal writing / Edwina Higgins, Laura Tatham. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
On Thursday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided Viacom v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
Stay tuned for another case analysis, TCD, Inc. v. [read post]
