Search for: "Hodge v. US" Results 301 - 320 of 996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
In the light of this, it considered that Parliament’s choice to use the wording of “serious harm” could only have represented an intentional departure from the previous decisions in Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 74 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
In a long awaited decision by the UK Supreme Court, the matter was (finally) put to bed, at least in the UK.The case of Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation concerned a dosage patent owned by ICOS (EP1173181), which related to the use of tadalafil (more commonly known as Cialis) in a dosage form for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
In a long awaited decision by the UK Supreme Court, the matter was (finally) put to bed, at least in the UK.The case of Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation concerned a dosage patent owned by ICOS (EP1173181), which related to the use of tadalafil (more commonly known as Cialis) in a dosage form for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
  The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Hodges, he excoriated at length the Lochner decision itself, its activist embrace of “courts . . . substitut[ing] their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies . . . [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Jennifer Elisa Chapman, University of Maryland Thurgood Marshall Law Library, has posted United States v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:18 am by CMS
There was no uniformity in the use of the expression “suspension” in 1974 when the Athens Convention was adopted. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:44 am
However, the court could prevent Huawei from using the technology to which the SEPs relate, unless they entered into a global licence. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In her scholarly paper, Professor Hodges proposes instituting a negotiation or bargaining requirement into employment contracts in order to protect employee rights in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s recent Epic Systems v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 2:56 am
The Supreme Court has not given us much help in resolving similar issues in the future.The decision was very different in tone to Warner Lambert and Lilly v Actavis. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am by UKSC Blog
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Frances Denney, a trainee patent attorney, comment on the decision of the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Actavis Group PTC EHF and Ors v ICOS Corporation and Anor [2019] UKSC 15. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:22 am
Particularly, Lord Hodge agreed with the Court of Appeal that tadalafil can be used to treat sexual dysfunction and would have highly motivated a skilled person to pursue tadalafil in clinical trials. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:28 am by Brian Cordery
The patent The relevant patent claims relate to the use of a given dosage unit of tadalafil (1-5mg), up to a maximum dose of 5mg per day, for use in sexual dysfunction (the claims are in both EPC 2000 format (a purpose-limited product claim) and in Swiss-form (a purpose-limited process claim)). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Drug Policy Nora Demleitner, Washington and Lee University School of Law, Drug Courts: Not a Public Health Solution Katherine Drabiak, University of South Florida College of Public Health, Questioning Medication Assisted Treatment James Hodge, Arizona State University College of Law, Supervised Injection Facilities: Legal and Policy Reforms Daniel Orenstein, University of California San Francisco, Grassroots of Grass: Cannabis Legalization Ballot Initiative Campaign Contributions and… [read post]
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in the Bland case [1993] AC 789 , 877, the questions for us are questions of law, “[but] behind the questions of law lie moral, ethical, medical and practical issues of fundamental importance to society”. [read post]