Search for: "Holder v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 7,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 am
In its decision on the case Johannes Gerrit Cornelis van Schaik v Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in Para 21 the Court has ruled that: ...Article 4 of the directive further provides that the roadworthiness tests, within the meaning of the directive, are to be carried out by the State or by bodies or establishments designated and directly supervised by the State. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
Especially when, as here, they're time-sensitive matters in which delay constitutes a substantial downside itself.It's even worse in this particular case, because the Ninth Circuit ends up doing exactly what the United States asked it to do over three years ago when it filed a motion to remand the case to the BIA. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
That someone who the INS knows is present in the United States without authorization would have things resolved in, oh, I don't know, under two decades.Not so, apparently.Impressive on all fronts.P.S. - The Ninth Circuit grants Chay's petition in part and remands. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
” Caldwell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
Wasserman Rajec* In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 4:15 am
In Nguyen v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
The new case is Walker v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:23 pm
(Rittenhouse v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
For example, consider the Fifth Circuit decision from 2009, United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm
In Pearson Education v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 8:13 am
Recently, in GEICO v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
Which might start with a critique of the manner in which Judge O'Scannlain unhelpfully begins his opinion, with a first paragraph that reads (in its entirety): "We are called upon to decide whether an alien may be removed from the United States for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude as determined under federal immigration law. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:10 pm
In Oliver Twist or in the modern United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:11 pm
Holder 13-1301 Issue: (1) Whether the biological basis for sex discrimination articulated in Nguyen v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 8:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:37 pm
See Judulang v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:30 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Boyer v. [read post]
