Search for: "Holmes v. Powers" Results 301 - 320 of 650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 12:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Holmes’s duties as a supervisor employed by the Mint. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
State of Indiana is a fact-specific case involving the question of whether defendant can be retired on the charge of resisting law enforcement in a driving under the influenece case, the Court rules: "We conclude that the State did not present sufficient evidence to establish that Sapen forcibly resisted Captain Holmes by strong, violent or powerful means to evade Captain Holmes' rightful exercise of his duties. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
The most frequently-quoted example of the limitation upon the Freedom of Speech is the quote from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in his 1919 written opinion in Schenck v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:57 am
Tsai argues that the Court has been able to pull off this feat by employing stirring rhetoric and powerful metaphors. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Their only power -- to seek state punishment for rule violators -- is a regressive function. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am by Andrew Hamm
He was not able to avoid the issue in Buck v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
United States) “The Boldest Moves: When and How to Make Them” (focusing on the power grab in Bush v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 am by JB
Oliver Wendell Holmes once remarked that the epigraph on his tombstone should read, "Here lies the supple tool of power. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm by Ken White
S. 644, 655 (1929) (Holmes, J., dissenting). [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am by Andrew Hamm
Holmes wrote that, despite “the effective and powerful example of Brandeis to the contrary I don’t think opinions should be written in the form of essays with notes – they are theoretically spoken. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs considers what the Court’s ruling last month in Scialabba v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by NL
In addition the fact is that in the present case Mr Bond considered whether Camden should exercise its discretionary power to secure accommodation for Mr Mitu; and decided that it should not. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by NL
In addition the fact is that in the present case Mr Bond considered whether Camden should exercise its discretionary power to secure accommodation for Mr Mitu; and decided that it should not. [read post]