Search for: "Horne v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:58 pm by Neil Cahn
Horn and Philip Parlante, of Horn & Horn, of Huntington, represented the mother. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:13 am by John Knepper
The horn has sounded, and the race to the courthouse has begun. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:34 am
Supreme Court exempts Texas courts from World Court ruling After two Supreme Court reversals, Texas man sentenced to life Posts from Capital Defense Weekly: Two notable state supreme court opinions on the right to privacy VHAC update Presumed guilty Scott Panetti on remand The Eleventh Circuit paints a dim picture of life in the lower federal courts The hidden costs of the death penalty: California Abu Jamal v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:35 am
 [Kat pat to Professor Mike Schuster, Oklahoma State University] [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
  Defendant drives past the police -- allegedly under the influence -- as he's literally four seconds away from his home; noise blaring, honking his horn, etc. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 9:08 am
The Impact of Domestic Veto Players on Compliance with WTO Rulings Cale Horne, Kellan Robinson, & Megan Lloyd, The Relationship between Contributors’ Domestic Abuses and Peacekeeper Misconduct in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Arthur A Goldsmith, Out of Africa? [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Three years ago, in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:31 am by Rosalind English
London Christian Radio Ltd and Anor v Radio Advertising Clearance Centre (RACC) and Secretary of State for Culture – read judgment The High Court has upheld the refusal of the broadcasting regulator to clear an advertisement for transmission on the grounds that it offended the prohibition on political advertising. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:31 am by Christy Unger
Horn, 504 F.3d 416 (3d Cir. 2007), another Fuentes opinion.Two additional things stand out in this section: first, the opinion ignores the previous week’s decision in Wood v. [read post]