Search for: "Howell v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm
Three days later, Judge Silberman noticed an appeal to the Executive Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States and to the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:06 pm
In a recent case, however, it was a federal magistrate judge who was the weak link, failing failed to ensure sufficient protection for the free speech rights of foreign nationals who used United States Service providers for their commentary. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
Howell wrote. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v… [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:01 pm
In the District Court, the case is titled only “Sealed v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Doug Berman (Sentencing Law and Policy) quotes some of my own favorite parts of the Constitution and opines that the criminal-law related provision given the least respect or attention in modern times is the Reprieves-and-Pardons Clause of Article II (“The President … shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment”). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
United States, the D.C. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 4:02 am
On June 1, 2021, the matter was assigned to United States District Court Judge Joshua Kindred. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito yesterday called the leak of his draft opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
In Wheaton v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
In many respects, being on the Supreme Court is like being President of the United States. [read post]
